Cross -Atlantic Commercial and Investment Partnership (TTIP) is a free trade agreement that is currently negotiating between Europe and the United States. As the new documentary ttip revealed, it may be correct. This agreement has caused a lot of controversy and protest among the masses, which is sufficient.
Most citizens believe that free trade is an important part of a healthy economy. Therefore, they usually believe that a new agreement between countries that belong to the banner of “free trade” must meet their maximum interests. However, in the past, these agreements not only increased tariffs, but also made the import and exit smooth transportation. Investment clauses are written in these agreements, especially the terms of handling investors’ Streit (ISDS). If the company thinks that its interests insult a country for any reason, a country can be sued. In essence, these trade agreements are awarded foreign investors with reference to all lenses, regardless of the consequences of national economy, civil rights and environmental protection.
A typical example: Canada. In 1992, the country signed a free trade agreement with the United States (NAFTA). For two decades, residents still felt the accidental impact of this agreement. Therefore, the results show that the results displayed in the movie, ISDS clauses allow the practice of unsolved fracture rights in the backyard of no unreasonable citizens. Their protests were largely hit by people who divergent people, because the energy company of the tissue cracking company was attacked by the energy company of the tissue to fracture the company. Canada has reason to feel the interests of the company or execute regulations for it. Since the death of the North American Free Trade Agreement, they have become one of the five most common countries in the world.
TTIP negotiations are confidential, and the public has not announced on its content. TTIP: It may be a call to improve transparency when the establishment of this agreement is correct, and warn the potential future. In this future, the government only works in the final result of foreign investors rather than the people they represent. Democracy itself may collapse under the weight of legal disputes.
